Returned the exception in action check, it seems that we are missing how 2 exceptions are

handled together. For example SSBM got both 32 and 4 exception together but with the hack 4 is 
lost. Removed some junk from LLE logging


git-svn-id: https://dolphin-emu.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@3682 8ced0084-cf51-0410-be5f-012b33b47a6e
This commit is contained in:
nakeee
2009-07-05 16:18:17 +00:00
parent 0932c11b9c
commit 36883d6a48
3 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ void gdsp_ifx_write(u16 addr, u16 val)
default:
if ((addr & 0xff) >= 0xa0) {
if (pdlabels[(addr & 0xFF) - 0xa0].name && pdlabels[(addr & 0xFF) - 0xa0].description) {
WARN_LOG(DSPLLE, "%04x MW %s (%04x)", g_dsp.pc, pdlabels[(addr & 0xFF) - 0xa0].name, val);
INFO_LOG(DSPLLE, "%04x MW %s (%04x)", g_dsp.pc, pdlabels[(addr & 0xFF) - 0xa0].name, val);
}
else {
ERROR_LOG(DSPLLE, "%04x MW %04x (%04x)", g_dsp.pc, addr, val);
@ -228,14 +228,14 @@ u16 gdsp_ifx_read(u16 addr)
default:
if ((addr & 0xff) >= 0xa0) {
if (pdlabels[(addr & 0xFF) - 0xa0].name && pdlabels[(addr & 0xFF) - 0xa0].description) {
NOTICE_LOG(DSPLLE, "%04x MR %s (%04x)\n", g_dsp.pc, pdlabels[(addr & 0xFF) - 0xa0].name, gdsp_ifx_regs[addr & 0xFF]);
INFO_LOG(DSPLLE, "%04x MR %s (%04x)", g_dsp.pc, pdlabels[(addr & 0xFF) - 0xa0].name, gdsp_ifx_regs[addr & 0xFF]);
}
else {
ERROR_LOG(DSPLLE, "%04x MR %04x (%04x)\n", g_dsp.pc, addr, gdsp_ifx_regs[addr & 0xFF]);
ERROR_LOG(DSPLLE, "%04x MR %04x (%04x)", g_dsp.pc, addr, gdsp_ifx_regs[addr & 0xFF]);
}
}
else {
ERROR_LOG(DSPLLE, "%04x MR %04x (%04x)\n", g_dsp.pc, addr, gdsp_ifx_regs[addr & 0xFF]);
ERROR_LOG(DSPLLE, "%04x MR %04x (%04x)", g_dsp.pc, addr, gdsp_ifx_regs[addr & 0xFF]);
}
return gdsp_ifx_regs[addr & 0xFF];
}