More DSPSpy findings - nakee's "TSTAXL" isn't test. Not sure what it is though.

git-svn-id: https://dolphin-emu.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@3003 8ced0084-cf51-0410-be5f-012b33b47a6e
This commit is contained in:
hrydgard
2009-04-18 21:35:21 +00:00
parent d939afdcf2
commit b4c22390ac
4 changed files with 39 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@ -240,8 +240,8 @@ const DSPOPCTemplate opcodes[] =
{"TST", 0xb100, 0xf7ff, DSPInterpreter::tst, nop, 1 | P_EXT, 1, {{P_ACC, 1, 0, 11, 0x0800}}, dsp_op_ext_ops_pro, dsp_op_ext_ops_epi},
// GUESSING NOT SURE AT ALL!!!!
{"TSTAXL", 0xa100, 0xffff, DSPInterpreter::tstaxl, nop, 1 | P_EXT, 1, {{P_REG1A, 1, 0, 8, 0x0100}}, dsp_op_ext_ops_pro, dsp_op_ext_ops_epi},
// Definitely not TSTAXL, it affects one of the accumulators. (a100 or a900, same op, one parameter).
{"TSTAXL", 0xa100, 0xffff, DSPInterpreter::tstaxl, nop, 1 | P_EXT, 1, {{P_ACC, 1, 0, 11, 0x0800}}, dsp_op_ext_ops_pro, dsp_op_ext_ops_epi},
{"TSTAXH", 0x8600, 0xfeff, DSPInterpreter::tstaxh, nop, 1 | P_EXT, 1, {{P_REG1A, 1, 0, 8, 0x0100}}, dsp_op_ext_ops_pro, dsp_op_ext_ops_epi},