mirror of
https://github.com/dolphin-emu/dolphin.git
synced 2025-01-11 08:39:13 +01:00
45f7883ed8
Hiding and not implementing the copy constructor is a pre-C++11 thing. It should also be noted that a copy constructor, as defined by the language, contains a const qualifier on its parameter, so this wouldn't have prevented copies from being performed. It also follows that if the copy constructor is deleted, then copy assignment should also be forbidden.