The-Homebrew-Cloud/mini
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fail0verflow/mini.git synced 2024-11-24 20:26:55 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

not sure erase is using IRQ correctly; make a note for later

Browse Source 
(I don't want to fix it unless it's broken)
This commit is contained in:
bushing 2009-05-02 04:25:59 -07:00
parent 7e40961741
commit 1d66f36578
1 changed files with 3 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
nand.c
View File

@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ void nand_irq(void)
dc_flushrange((void*)current_request.args[1], PAGE_SIZE); dc_flushrange((void*)current_request.args[1], PAGE_SIZE);
dc_flushrange((void*)current_request.args[2], ECC_BUFFER_SIZE); dc_flushrange((void*)current_request.args[2], ECC_BUFFER_SIZE);
break; break;
default:
gecko_printf("Got IRQ for unknown NAND req %d\n", current_request.req);
} }
code = current_request.code; code = current_request.code;
tag = current_request.tag; tag = current_request.tag;
@ -234,6 +236,7 @@ void nand_erase_block(u32 pageno) {
__nand_set_address(0, pageno); __nand_set_address(0, pageno);
nand_send_command(NAND_ERASE_PRE, 0x1c, 0, 0); nand_send_command(NAND_ERASE_PRE, 0x1c, 0, 0);
__nand_wait(); __nand_wait();
// should we really be using NAND_FLAGS_IRQ here?
nand_send_command(NAND_ERASE_POST, 0, NAND_FLAGS_IRQ | NAND_FLAGS_WAIT, 0); nand_send_command(NAND_ERASE_POST, 0, NAND_FLAGS_IRQ | NAND_FLAGS_WAIT, 0);
NAND_debug("nand_erase_block(%d) done\n", pageno); NAND_debug("nand_erase_block(%d) done\n", pageno);
} }