Using DiscIO's NAND content loader is the wrong way to get the ticket
for a title, because it checks whether the TMD is present and the
validity check fails if it isn't. This is not the correct behaviour:
we should just read the ticket from /ticket without caring about TMDs.
* IOS doesn't rely on the number of contents indicated in the TMD.
Instead, it checks whether the contents *do* exist on the NAND.
* Implement ES_GetTMDStoredContents (and the count ioctlv).
* Drop a hack in ES_GetStoredContents, which is unnecessary now that
we do it properly.
This is slightly safer than writing contents to /title directly.
We still cannot rename everything in one go atomically, but this allows
implementing AddTitleCancel very easily.
Also, this ensures that when a title import fails, no incomplete files
will be left in the title directory, which can mess up the system menu.
This adds a check to the SSL code to make sure we are using the correct
client certificate and key (and root CA).
Now, instead of silently failing, the user will be notified whenever a
file is missing or when it is invalid, i.e. when the hash does not
match; this is likely to happen for existing users as the program
linked in the network guide extracted the wrong certs :(
This partially restores a hack which causes ES to fake ticket views for
IOS titles.
This is necessary because we still allow users to boot games from the
game list, so, with no way of making sure the required IOSes are
installed beforehand, games may OSPanic() when they try to reload to
some IOS version and just find out that the IOS is not installed
(something which *never* happens on the real console, of course).
A warning is printed in the logs to make sure technical users know the
IOS titles are being faked. To try and keep things accurate in all
other cases, this hack is only active when it is needed (when the
current title is a disc title which was launched from the game list).
This adds a hash check for imported contents. IOS does it for security;
we do it for a somewhat different reason, to catch content decryption
bugs before incorrectly decrypted contents get written to the NAND,
which can cause titles to be corrupted.
Either way, we should have been doing this check in all cases.
const, when used on value type parameters in the declaration,
is superfluous. This doesn't really convey any information to take note
of when using the function. This only matters in the definition when you
want to prevent accidental modification.
e.g.
// Header
void CalculateSomething(int lhs, int rhs);
// Definition
void CalculateSomething(const int lhs, const int rhs)
{
// lhs and rhs can't accidentally be modified
}
