We want to use positional arguments in translatable strings
that have more than one argument so that translators can change
the order of them, but the question is: Should we also use
positional arguments in translatable strings with only one
argument? I think it makes most sense that way, partially
so that translators don't even have to be aware of the
non-positional syntax and partially because "translatable
strings use positional arguments" is an easier rule for us
to remember than "transitional strings which have more than
one argument use positional arguments". But let me know if
you have a different opinion.
They are unused, since there is no C++ code that touches
these settings. See the discussion in PR 9152, which is
a PR that adds a lot more Android-specific settings.
I moved it from the main settings screen to the in-game menu
in PR 8439 so that it could be changed while a game is running,
but now that the main settings can be accessed while a game is
running, there's no reason to not put it in the main settings.
https://bugs.dolphin-emu.org/issues/12067
Time for yet another new iteration of working around the
"surface destruction during boot" problem...
This time, the strategy is to use a mutex in MainAndroid.cpp.
Unfortunately, compilers will issue warnings when using offsetof with
non-standard layout types even when offsetof actually works fine here;
just having a virtual function is enough to trigger the warning...
Let's just stop the scan threads explicitly in destructors instead of
relying on member destruction order.
As in the comment, the panning was denaturalizing the volume (when the panning was at 0).
Unless users actually want to use panning, their wii mote volume should not be reduced, it should come out at the same volume the samples were.
If users want to reduce the volume of the wii mote speakers, they can do so from the wii home menu.
I opted for this instead of adding another setting "Enable Panning" as it would have been confusing, and the changes in the panning formula are unlikely to have any negative effect, as it still works.
Common shouldn't be depending on APIs in Core (in this, case depending
on the PowerPC namespace). Because of the poor separation here, this
moves OSThread functionality into core, so that it resolves the implicit
dependency on core.
